The First Amendment
by Kevin Scott
(May 19, 2010)

Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

In the opinion of many, the First Amendment is the single most important part of the Constitution. It protects some of the most basic human rights and reflects a view of the dangerous places government might tread.

The ability to speak your mind is a right that Americans take for granted. Imagine being too frightened by the possible consequences of speaking out to actually do so. Your opinion would not matter — even your vote would be corrupted. Even as important is the right to petition your government — not only can you have an opinion about your government, the government must listen to you (though it need not heed you — but that's what elections are for).

Some of the first colonists of the nation for which the Constitution was written had been seeking to escape religious persecution. The constitutions of several of the states prohibited public support of religion (though some did explicitly support or demand adherence to Christianity). Above all, the many varying sects of Christianity in America required that to be fair to all, there could be preference to none. It would have been disgraceful for anyone to wish to leave the United States because of religious persecution. So the authors decided it best to keep the government out of religion. This is not to say that the United States was not or is not a religious nation. Religion plays a big role in the everyday life of Americans, then and now. But what the authors were striving for is tolerance... something many so-called liberal Americans are lacking.

As for the press, the authors of the Constitution  regarded a free press as the watchdog/ombudsman for all citizens to constantly be kept informed of government's activities and actions to insure that government met their oaths of office to follow the supreme law of the nation- the Constitution. Though today's tabloid papers and television might give one pause, this kind of trash is a small price to pay to ensure that any news organization can rest assured that it can report freely and truthfully  on the legal activities of the government. Many other organizations in other nations have to worry about toeing the state's line or be shut down. How objective do you think a reporter can be when his life could be ended because of a critical story? Freedom of the press is predicated on the assumption that the press truthfully and without personal bias, reports and comments on these activities of the government. There is wide concern today that many in the press have become an extension of the government, omitting to live up to the criteria presumed to go hand in hand with the unique freedom accorded to the press. The Constitution in no way included freedom of the press as an unrelated organ of government, controlled by and based upon the inherent bias of those that are part of government.

The history of why freedom of the press was important enough to warrant it being the first amendment to the Constitution is quite clear. It is equally clear that freedom of the press assumes that journalists are exhibiting unbiased truth, not only in what they elect to communicate, but also in the selection of which information they elect not to communicate. It is also abundantly clear that journalists today do not subscribe to the origins and reasons for their unique status.
It makes one wonder if the first amendment as written means anything in the context that the Constitution itself, was constructed to protect the rights of all citizens, not to convey special status to any unique group within the population.